Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Colorado - The Battleground Again – 2016

Colorado will again be a battleground state. Senator Michael Bennet will be a must hold seat for the Democratic Senate if they are to have any chance of taking back the majority (need 4 seats if they win the presidency).

Congressman Mike Coffman’s seat maybe open if he moves up to take on Bennet or it may just be a fight to hold it (although after his romp in 2014 he looks more secure for 2016).

Most presidential polls show the state competitive; i.e., Clinton vs Bush, et al.

And, along with losing the gubernatorial race, Republicans were most disappointed in the thin win in one house (Senate). They will be back for round two.

Americans Divided on Senate Torture Report

A host of new polls cast doubt on support for many conclusions in the Senate torture report. In general, a majority of the public believes that torture can be justified under certain circumstances, namely dealing with terrorists, and that the Senate report’s claim that the techniques do not produce useful information is not credible.

Large percentages also believe the report was unfair toward the CIA and a majority believes its release could hurt national security.
  • 59% said CIA methods were justified, majority believes it produced valuable intelligence and torture of suspect terrorists can be justified “often” or “sometimes.” 53% believe produced intelligence could not have been acquired any other way. (Washington Post/ABC News poll, Dec. 14, 2014)
  • 47% say report unfair to CIA and 52% say wrong to release it (Washington Post/ABC News poll, Dec. 14, 2014)
  • 51% believe “harsh interrogation practices on suspected terrorist” were “acceptable under the circumstances” (Wall Street Journal/NBC News, Dec. 14, 2014)
  • Only 28% said they were wrong and only a similar 28% said they should not be used, 45% said it was okay to continue them (Wall Street Journal/NBC News, Dec. 14, 2014)
  • 80% of Republicans said it was acceptable and 32% of Democrats
  • 58% disagree with the Senate report’s conclusion that practice didn’t provide useful intelligence to stop terror attacks (Pew Research, Dec. 14, 2014)

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Does Colorado Economy Go Down In Oil Price Bust?

Oil below $60 a barrel priced at Brent crude will be a huge boom for American consumers and boost for the economy. Analysts describe the price drop similar to a $125 billion tax cut in 2015 or about $550 to $1,000 more to spend on items other than gas.

But it will affect gas and oil producing states. Colorado is not as dependent on oil and gas production for either tax revenue or as a percentage of employment and salaries as eight other states. But it’s on the cusp and Downtown Denver would certainly along with selected Western Slope counties see layoffs and slowdowns.

The eight states that will be hit the hardest start with North Dakota, Texas and Wyoming because of the significance gas and oil exploration is to the economy and to state and local tax revenue.
In Colorado, Weld County is the state’s Saudi Arabia and it will see an impact depending on how long the price stays below $60 which is near the breakeven point for hydraulic fracking on the Niobrara basin. The Western Slope counties of Garfield (Glenwood), Mesa (Grand Junction), and Rio Blanco will also see an affect.

Bennet on List of Tough Re-elections

The lists have started for 2016. The Democrats only need four seats to take back the Senate (if they win the White House, five if not) but they will need to defend a couple of vulnerable senators seeking re-election including Michael Bennet.

Republicans have a tough map in 2016 with seven senators up in Obama states, the inverse of 2014. Democrats also hope to benefit from higher turnout. Forecasting will start soon and Colorado will be closely watched.

Bennet barely won in the Republican year of 2010 and just lost his colleague Mark Udall. President Obama will likely still be well below 50 percent approval and the state will probably be a presidential battleground so the expectation is Bennet will have a tough race if Republicans find a candidate.

A couple of points in Bennet’s favor besides a record electorate of 3 million voters. He is a better candidate than Udall with higher visibility in both D.C. and Colorado, the Denver Post likes him and he is a prodigious fundraiser.

The Hill newspaper list of senate seats in play.

Monday, December 29, 2014

Cuba – The Public is Ready for a Change

President Obama has support from a majority of Americans for normalizing diplomatic relations with Cuba in spite of partisan differences. Even Cuban-Americans support diplomatic relations. Lifting the travel ban is the most popular aspect of the actions proposed.

2014 Florida International University in Miami Cuba poll of Cuban-Americans shows:
  • 68% favor diplomatic relations
  • 90% among younger respondents
  • 69% favor lifting all travel restrictions
  • 71% say embargo hasn’t worked
CBS has asked Americans if they are in favor of “reestablishing relations with Cuba” since 1977, and the percentage has varied, but has been near 50 percent (slightly above or below) over the years and is now 54 percent.

There are the usual partisan divisions over Cuban policy, especially as to the likelihood normalization will improve democracy for the Cuban people. Only 26 percent of Republicans believe it will lead to more democracy whereas 51 percent of Democrats do. But the public, including Republicans (66% favor), favor lifting travel restrictions (77% favor overall).

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Obama Starts 2015 in Better Shape Than Democratic Party

President Obama taking executive action during the last couple of months has kept him in the news, prioritized his issues, defined his position, and greatly pleased core constituents. Obama’s approval rating has moved above the 42 or so percent it has been stuck at for all of 2014 and contributed to the deep party losses in November (see Dec. 15 blog: Republicans Control Most State Legislatures).

The Cuba diplomatic decision was one executive action that contributed to his uptick in approval.

“As you know, the public is concerned about the level of executive action,” said Floyd Ciruli, 9News political analyst. “One place where the president, however, is asserting himself, and of course you can in foreign policy, is through executive action.”

“You cannot get out from under an embargo without congressional action. You can’t fund an embassy without congressional action,” Ciruli said. “So congress will be involved, but I think the president does have authority to try and reopen diplomatic relations.”

And it’s those same types of decisions that Ciruli believes Obama will continue to push forward for his legacy as he tries to finish his term through a Republican-controlled Congress.

“Fundamentally, what I think he's looking for is that ever so often, he’s going to do something to make sure that you know that he’s in this game because he suspects very little is going to get through congress,” Ciruli said.

See 9News: Obama issues 'executive orders by another name"

Denver Metro Area Provides 65 Percent of Democrats’ 2014 Vote

Although Republicans made gains statewide, the Denver metro area continued to provide winning margins for Democrats. As expected, the seven Denver metro counties provided about 56 percent of the total statewide vote (about 1.1 million), but 65 percent of the Democratic vote. The seven metro counties supported Governor John Hickenlooper by 56 percent and Senator Mark Udall by 53 percent over their respective Republican rivals (Hickenlooper won statewide with 49% and Udall lost with 46%). Some metro residents split their ballot between Hickenlooper and Udall. Thirty-seven thousand more metro voters supported Hickenlooper than Udall.

Compared to Senator Michael Bennet’s 2010 election, Udall ran one percent (53%) behind Bennet (54%) in the metro area and Cory Gardner ran one percent (41%) better than Ken Buck (40%). Udall lost for a variety of reasons, but running behind Hickenlooper by 37,000 votes in the metro area (9,000 in Denver alone) was a major factor.

Denver (74%) and Boulder (68%) counties provided substantial margins for Hickenlooper. Arapahoe and Jefferson counties have shifted more firmly to the Democratic side of high-profile statewide elections while still electing numerous local Republicans, such as Congressman Coffman and county officials. Of the metro counties, Douglas is by far the most Republican. Adams, a traditionally Democratic county, provided the most interesting results. The county is undergoing significant demographic change and Republicans did much better than expected (also turnout was especially low).

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Three Million Voters in 2016 Presidential Election

In the 2014 national election, only 36 percent of eligible voters participated. California was at the low end of the scale with 31 percent. Colorado was at the high end of the states with 54 percent of eligible voters casting a ballot.

The state’s voter participation is typically above the national average. The 2014 final count of 2,080,000 was in line with previous midterm turnout. The range of turnout predictions ran from 2.0 to 2.2 million voters.

Mark Udall’s campaign claimed that 2.1 million voters was their goal. Given the preference of voters who turned out, it would not have been sufficient even if every additional voter supported him (from 2,080,000 to 2,100,000). However, if the final number had been 2.2 million and he received two-thirds of the final vote, he would have made up his 38,000 vote deficit. A possible, but unlikely, scenario. In other words, given the percentage of the vote, Udall received (i.e., 46 percent to Gardner’s 48 percent) more turnout; i.e., the Bannock Street Project, was not likely to save him.

Turnout will also be a much discussed factor in the next presidential election. The 2016 election could attract three million Colorado voters. That would be a 50 percent increase over the two million midterm voters and 400,000 above the 2.6 million who voted in the Obama vs. Romney 2012 election.

The 3 million voter projection for 2016 is based on historic turnout percentages from presidential elections and an assumption on the number of newly registered voters as shown in the chart above. Colorado is the fifth fastest growing state in the country and large numbers of Millennial voters are reaching 18 years old. The estimated used in this analysis is 400,000 new voters.

Democrats had hoped spending $15 million on a turnout effort in Colorado in 2014 was going to save them from a bad election environment and, ultimately, a weak campaign. Not surprising, they believe the increased turnout in 2016 will be a key advantage. But, the lesson of the 2014 midterm election is that a campaign cannot be rescued by a turnout effort if it is losing on message, regardless of the effort’s sophistication or cost.

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Denver Mayor Unopposed?

It seems surprising that Mayor Michael Hancock may get through his first re-election effort with no serious opposition. Often politicians’ biggest challenges come at their first re-elections. Among recent Denver mayors, two were challenged and one had a walk. Denver mayors Federico Peña and Wellington Webb faced major challenges. Peña barely won re-election in 1987 and Webb lost the first round, but then scored a solid win in the 1993 run-off. Most recently, John Hickenlooper easily won re-election in 2007.

There are good reasons why serious politicians would shy away from a challenge to Hancock:
  • It is rare a seated mayor is defeated. The last time, Bill McNichols in his third re-election effort was defeated by Peña in 1983.
  • Hancock has support among major Democratic factions in a city dominated by Democrats. The African American, Hispanic and liberal communities do not appear dissatisfied or talking up potential opponents.
  • The Denver economy is booming. In fact, if there are complaints, it’s from overdevelopment. Various neighborhood groups are objecting to the number of cranes, scrape-offs and infill projects in the city. Sales tax revenue is up 9 percent this year. Housing values are increasing (and, of course, costs) and downtown office buildings are full, especially from the energy boom.
  • Hancock is congenial and mostly low-key. He attends charitable fundraising events more often than TV studios or press conferences. It appears to serve him well.
In spite of the longshot nature of a successful challenge, there are issues that have damaged his administration’s reputation. The jail is a constant source of bad news, some of which plays into the current dialogue on police and minority relations. Cost overruns and various controversies surround the airport, the City’s most important asset and economic generator. And, the aforementioned residential-developer conflicts have several neighborhoods stirred up. Whether or not these issues lower the Mayor’s voter favorability, which registered at 70 percent in a 2013 poll, remains to be seen. Typically, the neighborhood pain threshold must get very high for Denverites to turn against a reasonable amount of residential and commercial growth and the tax base and jobs it brings.

Is an opponent possible in this environment; i.e., someone beyond an eccentric or easy to ignore gadfly?

Monday, December 15, 2014

Landrieu Loses – The End of the Democratic South

With the win in Louisiana, Republicans gain nine senate seats and the last Democratic seat in the South. It has been an amazing transition from an entirely Democratic Deep South in 1960 to an entirely Republican one in 2014.

As of today, not including Florida or Virginia, no southern state from Texas to Arkansas to Georgia and the Carolinas has a Democratic senator, governor or Democratic-controlled legislature.  The transition was slow. Numerous Southern Democrats were able to combine the minority voting population with white Democrats into the 1990s. But, as the national party moved left, especially in the last decade, there were insufficient liberal white voters to get to a majority. Ms. Landrieu was the end.

Republicans Control Most of State Legislatures

Democrats hanging onto the Colorado House was an anomaly. The national Republican sweep was broad and deep.

Republicans added three governors (net) to a recent record high of 31. They extended their control of legislative chambers from 59 out of 98 to 68, another record (11 chambers flipped, including the Colorado State Senate). They now have the 4,100 legislative seats out of 7,363, a record high (since 1920).

Democrats controlled both houses of the legislature and the governorship in 15 states before the election, including Colorado. They now have just 7, compared to 23 Republican.

The 10-year dominance of Colorado Democrats was most felt at the state legislative level. Multi-millionaires, special interest groups and their strategists realized that, given their culture and social agenda, the state legislature should be the target and could be won over with money and organization.

On November 4 Election Night Republicans were within striking distance of a three-seat pickup in Senate and five in the House. Ultimately, they gained one and control of the Senate and three, but not control, in the House. Between reappointment and Democratic resources, Republicans have a ways to go to take control.

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Denver Holds Election and No One Shows Up

In May 2015, Denver will hold its quadrennial city elections. It will be a very different affair than the battle just culminated on November 4 for governor and senator. Denver could be holding an election and nobody shows up. The 2015 Denver City election does not appear to have a major personality or issue that has captured the Denver public or attention.

Barely a third of Denver’s potential voters participated in the May 2011 elections in a year when there was a serious contest for mayor. This year, with a no contest for mayor as yet, expect a record low turnout. All thirteen Denver City Council positions are up for election or re-election, plus the mayor, auditor and clerk. The following are open due to term limits:
Auditor Dennis Gallagher
  • Auditor Dennis Gallagher – retires
  • District 2 City Councilperson Jeanne Faatz – far Southwest (only Republican and fiscal watchdog)
  • District 4 City Councilperson Peggy Lehmann – far Southeast
  • District 6 City Councilperson Charlie Brown – Southeast
  • District 7 City Councilperson Christ Nevitt – South-Central (not term-limited, but running for auditor)
  • District 9 City Councilperson Judy Montero – Downtown, Northwest
  • District 10 City Councilperson Jeanne Robb – Capitol Hill, Central 
Dennis Gallagher, who is about to retire, was the top vote getter in 2011 when voter participation was 38 percent (113,367). Gallagher is the oldest elected person in Denver City government and the person most likely to take on the city’s power structure.

Mayor Michael Hancock
Denver remains a one-party town. Governor Hickenlooper received 74 percent of the vote and Mark Udall 71 percent while they barely winning or losing statewide (Hickenlooper 49%, Udall 46%). The only two non-Democrats on City Council are term-limited: Jeanne Faatz (Republican) and Charlie Brown (unaffiliated).

Mayor Michael Hancock is unopposed as of today. It is not uncommon to have unopposed candidates. In 2011, five candidates were unopposed: Charlie Brown, Peggy Lehman, Paul Lopez, Chris Nevitt and Jeanne Robb (there were a few write-in voters in several races).

City Council jobs pay more than $80,000 plus 30 percent in benefits. Elections often begin 12 years of office holding or more than a million dollars in salary and benefits. Denver elections are a serious jobs program.

Wednesday, December 10, 2014

Coffmans on a Roll

Mike and Cynthia Coffman were the power couple of the November election. Probably the only real surprise Election Night was Mike Coffman’s crushing defeat of Andrew Romanoff in the 6th Congressional District. A race that had been rated as possibly one of the closest in the country ended with a 9-point win and 8,500-vote advantage in Arapahoe County.

But Cynthia Coffman orchestrated an even larger 10-point win over former DA Don Quick for Attorney General. Her statewide vote total of 1,002,000 was second only to Governor Hickenlooper’s re-election total (4,000 votes behind) and the only other million vote winner.

Mike becomes the frontrunner in speculation for the U.S. Senate race. After a couple of years, if successful, Cynthia can consider a full range of options, including governor, the U.S. House or otherwise.
Mike and Cynthia Coffman

Colorado Competitive, California Boring

Colorado politics have been swinging back and forth with the national trends since the Barack Obama victory in 2008, including both Republican resurgences in the 2010 and today’s midterm (see Denver Post articles).

But California has steadily resisted the national oscillation, and the home of Reagan and Nixon is now firmly in the Democratic camp. It makes for boring; i.e., non competitive, elections. Democrats control the governorship, both senate seats, most of the congressional delegation, all statewide offices and have near super majorities in the legislature.

California’s best pollster, Mark DiCamillo, director of The Field Poll, explains why in a new article, which he will present at the Pacific Chapter of the American Association of Public Opinion Research on December 12, 2014 in San Francisco.

See Opinion Today: California the exception in a nation increasingly voting Republican

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Denver Metro Economic Surge

The latest sales tax revenue report from the Denver metro seven-county region shows a 9.78 increase over last year. A one-percent sales tax collected region-wide would have produced $380 million for local governments (or RTD) through September, on its way to a likely half billion by year’s end.

Colorado’s economy in 2014 has benefitted from the national economic improvement and specifically local population increases (3rd fastest growth in U.S. in 2013) and enhanced economic activity, such as the surge in gas and oil business.

Most investment analysts are cautious with next year’s forecasts holding stock market increases to less than 10 percent in 2015 (S&P 500) and many are at 5 percent or less. Possible economic slowdown is projected due to changes in the Fed’s interest rate policy and economic turmoil in Japan, Europe and China. The S&P is up 11 percent so far this year, and an average year sees a 7 percent gain.

Putin Debates His Future

Vladimir Putin addressed the speculation that he sees himself as ruling Russia as long as Joseph Stalin (ran USSR for more than 30 years) or Leonid Brezhnev (who served from the fall of Khrushchev until his death in 1982, 18 years).

The Russian constitution currently limits presidents to two 12-year terms (two separate 6-year elections). Putin’s term is up in 2018 and he could run again, serving until 2024.

If he runs for re-election, Putin could serve a total of 20 years and be Russia’s president to the end of the next U.S. president’s 8-year term (elected 2016 and could serve until 2024).

Putin is highly popular today due to his nationalist policies and state dominated media, including TASS – the state controlled news agency (where he recently pledged to abide by term limits).

As part of a recent exercise at the Korbel School, students speculated that sanctions and other problems with the Russian economy (low price of oil) could lead Putin to consider not running in 2018. The following were conditions outlined that he would be likely to want if he began to recruit a replacement.

Putin’s Goal. Find a replacement to run in 2018 who will:
  1. Protect his personal and family wealth, liberty and security (Yeltsin guarantee)
  2. Maintain (extend) imperial gains
  3. Maintain sufficient authoritarian control
  4. Maintain (extend) anti-Western ideology
  5. Win public opinion and the 2018 election
That replacement would look more like a military man (military currently held in high esteem) than a Kremlin bureaucrat (Medvedev). The main criterion for the leader is to win election most likely by addressing inflation and housing more than nationalism.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

Podesta Leads Obama’s Environmental Agenda and the Go-it-Alone Strategy

John Podesta
Photo: Reuters
John Podesta, who may be the second most influential person in the Obama administration after Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, has the environmental portfolio and most recently scored major coups with the power plant EPA standards and the Chinese global warming agreement. He also was the President’s spokesperson on the Keystone Pipeline, suggesting that a veto was likely even if the Senate managed to find sixty votes (they got 59).

Podesta’s most important contribution to the administration’s effort to remain relevant is using agencies, foreign policy and discretion (immigration) to operationalize Obama’s unrealized second term agenda and attempt to create a legacy.

The administration has public support on coal regulation, but it is out of alignment on the Keystone Pipeline. Most controversially, Podesta is leading the President into a major confrontation with public opinion on the use of his executive powers. Podesta, the consummate policy éminence grise (he may do a talk show or a special interest speech, but he generally stays well behind the President, secretary or agency head he’s guiding) may be producing a backlash from the overreach and is likely creating precedents for the next Republican administration.

Denver Regionalism Challenged

One of the significant assets of the Denver metro area has been its commitment to regionalism. Voters and leaders have supported the following initiatives:
  • SCFD elections: 1998, 1994, 2004
  • RTD: 1997, 2004
  • Baseball: 1990; football: 1998
  • Denver Metro Mayors Caucus (40 mayors, starts in 1993)
  • Metro Denver Economic Development Cooperation (70 organizations, 1980s)

But today, there are many challenges. The key will be how to maintain shared fortunes and futures:
  • Core city population growth and economic viability (650,000), 3rd fastest growing state 2004, tops in job growth, 6th fastest growing city 2014
  • Airport and tourism as shared regional assets
  • Tamping down regional economic rivalries

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

Denver Post Opinion: The Price of Popularity

In a Denver Post November 30 commentary, the impact of the 2014 battle for control of the U.S. Senate is analyzed.


  • The senate election in Colorado, the quintessential battleground state, was nationalized. Obama’s popularity and partisanship defined the race. “There are no public land issues debated.”
  • The proliferation of polls marshalled into powerful forecasts weeks before Election Day created the narrative of winners and losers.
  • More than a hundred million dollars flooded into the state, mostly from sources independent from the senate campaigns and it dominated the media messages voters saw.
  • Candidates became more isolated as strategies and messages were nationalized and the main task was to avoid mistakes.
The Price of Popularity – Colorado’s New Politics

The heat of the 2014 midterm elections has barely cooled, and voters’ ears are still ringing from the harangue of political ads. But how many of those appeals to voters dealt with issues specific to Colorado? Former House Speaker Tip O’Neill coined the long-used maxim, “all politics are local.” Recent midterm elections have trended away from that dictum, but the 2014 midterms may have buried it — at least in Colorado. The most distinguishing characteristic of its two senate candidates, Cory Gardner and Mark Udall, was their red or blue identity. Their biographies were known, but not salient. The most important issues were the president’s popularity (or lack of) and the control of the U.S. Senate. Gone are the quaint days when candidates debated public land issues, building a water project or funding the interstate highways.

Voters saw the beginning of this phenomenon in the 2008 presidential race when Colorado gained its reputation as a swing state and platform for presidential politics and played host to the Democratic Convention. The success of Senator Michael Bennet despite the 2010 Republican wave, highlighted the state’s importance. Colorado’s new national political standing grew in the 2012 presidential election when the state was fully targeted and featured on the maps of CNN, NBC and Fox and others. After decades of being a flyover state, Colorado hosted a presidential debate and saw repeated visits from the candidates, especially President Obama targeting Millennial and minority voters. Millions of dollars in TV advertising were placed by the campaigns, and frequent polls showed the oscillation between Obama, Romney and, finally, Obama. The state became a key platform for the national analysts and campaigns waging war in “battlegrounds.”

This year, the attention was on party control of the U.S. Senate, and those races became marque players in the national narrative. National Journal/CNN analyst Ron Brownstein describes our federal elections as evolving into a type of parliamentary system where the candidates and local issues take a backseat to the national outcome – in this case, control of the Senate.

This nationalization of the races greatly helped the Republicans this year. Mark Udall and his equally vulnerable colleagues in states such as Arkansas, North Carolina and Louisiana wanted to run local races on their own record as incumbents. But they were rapidly swept into the national drama of the Harry Reid vs. Mitch McConnell show and concentrated on how to avoid being seen or associated with President Obama.

Throwing gas on the fire of this nationalization was the proliferation of polling and the introduction of multiple competing forecasting models. From Labor Day to Election Day, Colorado saw a record number of more than 25 published polls on the U.S. Senate race with a rush toward the end. Nate Silver, the main proselytizer of the forecasting model that gained acclaim in the 2012 presidential race (his branded website 538), helped spawn more than a half dozen models this year hosted by the New York Times, Washington Post, and liberal blogs Huffington Post, Daily Kos and others.

Although there continues to be a debate about whether polls directly affect voters, clearly they affect the reporting of a race and can alter the behavior of the campaigns — in this case, to Mark Udall’s detriment. The forecasting models, used for the first time in the 2014 “control of the senate” storyline, blend local historical data, such as who won recent presidential elections, with candidate information, such as incumbency. Before Labor Day, there were few polls, but Colorado forecasts favored Udall – an incumbent in an Obama state. After Labor Day the forecasts were dominated by poll results and suddenly Udall was behind. That was mostly a product of the polls using their likely voter models and the uptick in advertising for GOP candidates.

During the last thirty days of the campaign, the forecasts showed Cory Gardner winning by a couple of points, with probabilities of more than 70 to 80 percent. The Udall campaign was tossed on the defensive. The campaign made public its own polls that showed Udall ahead and maintained the Bannock Street Project ground game would prove the forecasts wrong.

The massive outside money pouring into the Colorado senate battle was also a product of the nationalization of the race, and it harmed the incumbent. Of the money spent, the candidates expended barely one-third with Udall ahead. But the TV time purchases of both campaigns were swamped by the dollars from independent expenditures, namely Karl Rove and the Koch brothers for the Republicans, and the Harry Reid, Planned Parenthood and Tom Steyer committees for the Democrats. In addition, Udall’s “war on women” theme was further amplified by supportive independent spending making it even more overbearing.

The nationalization of the campaigns also contributed to the isolation of the candidates. As the TV advertising became dominant and the issues limited, the candidates’ main task was not to make a mistake. The lesson learned from the 2010 and 2012 cycles, especially for Republicans, was to avoid all social issue discussions and assume you are on the record and potentially viral at every moment. Colorado U.S. Senate candidates became hard to find.

This is the new Colorado election trend. Since this election re-affirmed Colorado’s battleground status, the state can expect more of the same for the 2016 elections when Senator Michael Bennet will be up for re-election and the country will pick a new president.  What can we expect? A couple of national themes, mostly around support and opposition to President Obama; massive money, mostly from independent sources; nonstop television advertising and starting early; forecast polling with predictions on a daily basis; and candidates in controlled, mostly artificial environments. Colorado is popular and this is the price. Can’t wait.

Floyd Ciruli, founder of Ciruli Associates, is a Denver-based pollster and director of the University of Denver’s Crossley Center for Public Opinion Research.

Denver Post: Chris Hill – In Defense of Diplomacy

Vince Carroll’s interview of ambassador and now dean, Chris Hill, demonstrated why Hill is a
Dean Hill
regular on cable news. He not only served in most of the world’s hotspots, but he has a rare diplomatic trait – saying what he thinks. Candor from diplomats, even when retired, is rare.

If you want to really know what a professional diplomat thinks about Iraq, read this interview.
  • The collapse of the Iraqi army. “The Shia weren’t going to fight for Sunni land.”
  • The surge. “Oversold.”
  • Leaving troops in Iraq after 2011. “But the Iraqis didn’t want it and Obama eventually said ‘ok, it’s your country.’”
  • Wolfowitz, Bolton. “Neocons.” “One of the most disgraceful performances by a foreign policy class in America.”
  • Negotiating with North Korea. Proud of changing U.S. reputation in Asia “as a result of our Six-Party process.”
  • Bombing in the Balkans. “I thought it was a bad idea whose time had come.”

Tuesday, December 2, 2014

Cameron’s Difficult Re-election

Prime Minister Cameron
Picture: Getty
Prime Minister David Cameron faces a difficult parliamentary election in May 2015. Not only does Britain’s historically stable parliamentary system appear to be fragmenting into a multiple party system requiring coalition governments, but his party, the Conservatives, appear to be losing their far right euro skeptics to a new independent party, UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party).

Cameron’s current partners, Liberal Democrats, are losing support and may be unable to help form a government. At the same time, opposition Labour, led by Ed Miliband, are no more popular than the Conservatives.
American political consultants David Axelrod and Jim Messina are helping Cameron’s Conservatives and Miliband’s Labour parties, respectively. As Obama’s top hands in 2008 and 2012, they know elections. But, they also are experts on producing gridlock.

H2O – 2015: The Year of Water

Pueblo Dam and Reservoir
One of the newly re-elected Governor Hickenlooper’s priorities in 2015 is to refine the about to be released draft state water plan into a final document. Articles in the Denver Post and other news outlets make clear that at least two interest groups continue to resist a plan that advocates Colorado developing its full share of water.

Fortunately, Colorado citizens strongly support the water planning process and the basic assumptions that undergird it.